Queer discrimination is the new black – Blog #2

For my second blog post, I decided to dissect the unjustly news article: Doctor refuses treatment of same-sex couple’s baby. This article is pertaining to a married lesbian couple, Krista and Jami Contreras, who gave birth to four-month-old Bay Windsor Contreras, in October 2014, at the comfort of their own home. Their midwife recommended a pediatrician, Dr. Vesna Roi who the couple was pleasant about and who “seemed pretty straight up” with them. Only six days after giving birth to their baby, the newly parents set up an appointment with Dr. Roi, which by their surprise, refused service because she “prayed on it and she won’t be able to care for Bay” (told by the replacing pediatrician, Dr. Karam). The married couple posted on social media about the discrimination that was bestowed upon them, which resulted to others writing letters to the facility. It wasn’t until after four months did Dr. Roi sent a letter to the Contreras apologizing for refusing service by stating, “Please know that I believe that God gives us free choice and I would never judge anyone based on what they do with that free choice”. By coming across this article, without hesitation, I had to deconstruct and analyze the ways in which it demonstrates systemic and intersecting discrimination of the LGBTQ community, and how both are still prevalent in modern societies.

For starters, people a part of the LGBTQ community often experience systemic discrimination against their sexual orientation, or preference. For places such as the United States of America, where the article was taken place, there are laws against same-sex marriage in various states in the country. Most of the time, if a queer couple wanted to ‘tie the knot’, they would often travel to the very few states that have legalized same-sex marriage. This insinuates that same-sex couples are an inconvenience to the societies that are often homophobic, or hateful and/or fearful of the LGBTQ community; so they make same-sex marriage an inconvenience to them. Such a basic right that should given to everyone, regardless of sex, gender, and sexuality, is voided and unavailable to same-sex couples – that should be free to express their love and unity.

This goes into another example where the law systemically discriminates queers, which the article has touched upon, regarding physicians’ refusal of service to patients. The American Medical Association, or AMA, have laws which states that “physicians cannot refuse to care for patients based on sexual orientation, but doctors can refuse treatment if it’s incompatible with their personal, religious or moral beliefs”. Although it is great that the AMA has laws that protect the LGBTQ community against physicians and practitioners who may have homophobic beliefs, this also backfires with the latter law, stated in the article, by allowing further discrimination to occur in a discreet, “it’s your prerogative” notion. This goes to show that on the surface, the laws, and the societies themselves, appear genderless or promote equality; but in fact, with other laws protecting the dominant culture, heterosexuals, it often contradicts and reinforces the stigma and degradation of queer individuals and whomever that do not fit with societal “norms” or the majority.

This leads to the intersecting discrimination that many queers experience on a day-to-day basis. For example, many same-sex couples and members of the LGBTQ community often face difficulties with hegemonic masculinity – relating to the cultural norms of masculinity and power – and emphasized femininity – relating to womanhood that is controlled by men – when regarding the intersection of their gender and sexuality. If, for instance, a queer individual takes on an essence or a different gender opposed of their assigned sex, one will often be accused of not being masculine or feminine enough. This leads to the individual being abandoned by one’s own sex because one does not fit the societal norms of what it is to be a “man” or “woman”. Thus, some queer males may not fully display hegemonic masculinity but express emphasized femininity and sometimes vise-versa for queer females. The discrimination against the intersection of gender and sexuality within the LGTBQ community is prevalent, promotes the gender binary that is popular to many societies, and puts such individuals as “the other”.

I close by stating that queers have come a long way in terms of gaining equal rights and acceptance within many societies. From the feminist movement, to the 1980’s epidemic of HIV/AIDS, the LGBTQ community has increasingly become more integrated within hetero-dominant cultures. It alarms me that after all the fighting that queers have done to be viewed as human, an article that has been published, as recent as February 2015, takes us back into a time warp; displaying that queer discrimination is still a current and recurring issue within many societies. As a whole we all need to help and find love for one another, fully accept one for who they are, and to free degradation and marginalization from ones’ lives. Love is unique to each individual, does not conform to what the media or popular conceptions have to say, and is a universal language that is understood through many bodies – why limit it to only a few?

Reference:

My Fox Detroit, Doctor refuses treatment of same-sex couple’s baby, http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/28142401/doctor-refuses-treatment-of-same-sex-couples-baby, accessed on March 9th, 2015. 

-Purple

Advertisements
Queer discrimination is the new black – Blog #2

6 thoughts on “Queer discrimination is the new black – Blog #2

  1. Purple,
    Interesting analysis of the article. You made some very nice connections with concepts and their relations to the article. I liked the build up the hegemonic masculinity and emphasized femininity, and how they intersect.
    For criticism, I would say that your writing style is awkward. This piece did not flow very well for me and I found it hard to read and follow. For example, when you said “By coming across this article, without hesitation, I had to deconstruct and analyze the ways in which it demonstrates systemic and intersecting discrimination of the LGBTQ community, and how both are still prevalent in modern societies.” You did not need “without hesitation” or “modern societies” parts. Those just added unnecessary text and took me out of your essay. In the future, I believe you should focus on improving your prose. Your analysis is very good, but your style is letting you down.

    -Grey

    Like

  2. Purple,
    This was a great review! You had a strong introduction, which clearly displayed a lot of background information that tied into the blog post nicely. You also clearly stated your main points that you will be arguing, a good start. I noticed that you paid a lot of attention to the article, and pointed out its connections to the real world, specifically mentioning the insinuation that same sex couples are viewed as a hassle. This is a strong idea that opens paths for more discussion, and plays a big part in the discrimination of the LGBTQ community. I also noticed that you paid attention, and mentioned in your piece, the contradicting laws that on the surface helps the LGBTQ community, but has room to backfire. Your comments on how that, and just like the rest of society, only promotes equality on the surface, but contradicts itself deeper within, was a unique and interesting idea. You also demonstrated a good understanding and reiteration of the terms used, I especially noticed this with the terms ‘hegemonic masculinity’ and ’emphasized femininity’. I also really enjoyed the personal touch where you could see your clear opinion throughout your writing. One thing that I would suggest to you would be to be careful of some of the terms that you used, and to make sure to focus on small grammatical errors here and there. Other than that, good job!
    -Red

    Like

  3. Grey,

    Thank you so much for the feedback! I did notice that my phrasing was a bit awkward, which could have made the piece weaker in that sense. I will for sure improve in my writing style and hopefully with the last post I can make greater improvements. Thanks for being honest, constructive criticism is the only way people can learn from their mistakes.
    -Purple

    Like

  4. Red,

    Wow, thank you so much for your comment! I thought that my piece was definitely the weakest of the group, but your feedback has lifted my spirits! I really do agree that the LGBTQ community is often viewed as an inconvenience to many societies, especially in America where they have laws restricting same-sex marriages in many parts of the country. I do hope that one day everyone can just be seen as human, and not classified with hierarchies or categories. I will for sure try to improve with the grammatical aspect of my work, it is usually my greatest weakness when it comes to writing.
    Thanks again,
    -Purple

    Like

  5. Purple,
    Nice post! I really enjoyed the fact that you related your post back to the systemic issues, this made you point very clear and obvious that you have done a lot of research on this topic and had a lot of insight to provide. You also had a very solid introduction to the article, however you might want to consider the length of your article introduction, it didn’t need to be as long to get across the point and issue of the article. One question I have for you would be, how do you think we can start to solve this issue? What does society need to change, and how?
    Overall, great piece!!

    -Green

    Like

  6. This was a very nice review! Your introduction caught my attention and kept it consistently throughout your review. You did a great job giving the reader background information, as well as describing your own opinion in the article. I really liked your conclusion and how you discussed the ways the LGBTQ community has fought for their rights and yet there is still so much discrimination present today. I also enjoyed the way you incorporated the theme of Cornel West’s quote into your blog. Your terms were well used and I liked how you talked about the difficulties people of the LGBTQ community are faced with, such as hegemonic masculinity. This thoroughly displayed your knowledge of the topic and made for a great read. You added how we can we can create a society free of discrimination by finding love for one another and fully accepting one for who they are. I was wondering if you could expand on these point and how this will help the LGBTQ community.
    -Blue

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s